05 editable documentsOffline browser workbookOne-time no subscription
Service Menu Designer / Notion import + kit
Service package design & comparison template
Build a small understandable service menu with explicit deliverables and buyer fit.
Made for independent professionals simplifying their offers.
Price and availability
Catalog price: $19 USD
One-time purchase · No subscription
FilesZIP with five editable Markdown documents, an offline HTML workbook, a reading edition, and optional Notion import files (not a configured workspace). A five-document worked case follows one fictional project.
To useExtract the ZIP. Open the workbook in a current desktop browser; edit Markdown in a text editor. No account needed for the workbook or Markdown files. A Notion account is needed only for the optional import; set database properties and relations yourself.
LicenseUse for your own or client work; do not redistribute the original templates or tools. Full terms.
SupportProduct questions and corrections by email; no custom implementation or professional review. 14-day refund policy.
A small service menu whose options differ in useful scope.
Gather before you start
Buyer situations
Delivery capacity
Included outcomes
Mark missing information so you can check it before using your work.
When to skip this kit
You need a native Excel, Canva, or Word template. This download contains Markdown documents and an offline HTML workbook, plus Notion import files you configure yourself.
You need autosave or cloud sync. Export Markdown or save a backup before closing the offline workbook.
You need someone to complete the work. These are worksheets to fill in yourself.
Read the first worksheet below to see whether its questions help with your task.
Included files
What's inside
01Buyer situations
02Offer boundaries
03Delivery feasibility
04Comparison copy
05Menu test
Each document has instructions, questions, and space for your answers. The final document includes a common mistake to check for before using your work.
The worked case contains five completed documents, one for each worksheet. Follow the evidence, decisions, and corrections across the same fictional project. The case is included in the workbook, reading edition, Markdown example, and optional Notion import.
Your completion check
Differentiate buyer fit, concrete outputs, required inputs and exclusions; check the actual booking mix, preserve interpretation failures and bounded retests, and confirm pricing, availability and the live enquiry route before publication.
Before you finish
Check this before you use it
Packages differ only in vague labels such as premium.
Explain the actual deliverables, boundaries, and appropriate buyer situation.
Use the final worksheet to record what needs fixing and what you still need to check.
{{project}} / menu owner {{business}} / reviewer {{contact}} / version [ ]
Purpose: organize offers around the buyer’s task and readiness, rather than around every skill you possess.
Source register: enquiry/reference [ ]; date [ ]; buyer’s described task [ ]; current workaround [ ]; known input/approval readiness [ ]; relevant constraint [ ]; real permitted/fictional/hypothesis [ ]. Remove unnecessary personal details. Do not relabel invented examples as customer demand.
Situation map
Situation
task to decide/complete
ready inputs
missing evidence
possible offer or no fit
[Need diagnosis]
[decision]
[existing work/context]
[uncertainty]
[bounded review]
[Have approved brief]
[implementation task]
[scope/copy/owner]
[dependency]
[defined project]
[Have recurring bounded work]
[monthly priorities]
[request owner/budget]
[capacity]
[recurring plan]
[Need unsupported capability]
[actual task]
[context]
[provider]
[no fit / appropriate owner]
Preserve counterexamples: someone who needs no service, needs a different provider, or cannot supply essential inputs. A useful menu can make “none of these” clear instead of funneling every visitor into the most expensive option.
Write a fit sentence for each candidate: “Choose [offer] when [specific situation] and you can provide [inputs]. It supplies [output], not [likely unsupported assumption].” Avoid promising sales, engagement, certification, or savings without evidence appropriate to that claim.
Check overlap: if two offers address the same situation with the same output, simplify or state the concrete scope difference. A diagnosis offer must not be a compulsory extra purchase for a buyer who already has an approved brief, unless the actual service requires a distinct check and you explain why.
Ready when each candidate has a distinct task, start condition, useful output, and honest no-fit boundary. Separate evidence of comprehensibility from evidence that anyone will buy.
Your decision
What distinct situation would lead someone to each service?
My answer: [ ]
Source and date: [ ]
Still to check: [ ]
Next action, owner, and due date: [ ]
Before you start
Buyer situations: [Source or notes]
Delivery capacity: [Source or notes]
Included outcomes: [Source or notes]
What you will make
A small service menu whose options differ in useful scope.
View plain worksheet text
{{project}} / menu owner {{business}} / reviewer {{contact}} / version [ ]
Purpose: organize offers around the buyer’s task and readiness, rather than around every skill you possess.
Source register: enquiry/reference [ ]; date [ ]; buyer’s described task [ ]; current workaround [ ]; known input/approval readiness [ ]; relevant constraint [ ]; real permitted/fictional/hypothesis [ ]. Remove unnecessary personal details. Do not relabel invented examples as customer demand.
Situation map
Situation | task to decide/complete | ready inputs | missing evidence | possible offer or no fit
--- | --- | --- | --- | ---
[Need diagnosis] | [decision] | [existing work/context] | [uncertainty] | [bounded review]
[Have approved brief] | [implementation task] | [scope/copy/owner] | [dependency] | [defined project]
[Have recurring bounded work] | [monthly priorities] | [request owner/budget] | [capacity] | [recurring plan]
[Need unsupported capability] | [actual task] | [context] | [provider] | [no fit / appropriate owner]
Preserve counterexamples: someone who needs no service, needs a different provider, or cannot supply essential inputs. A useful menu can make “none of these” clear instead of funneling every visitor into the most expensive option.
Write a fit sentence for each candidate: “Choose [offer] when [specific situation] and you can provide [inputs]. It supplies [output], not [likely unsupported assumption].” Avoid promising sales, engagement, certification, or savings without evidence appropriate to that claim.
Check overlap: if two offers address the same situation with the same output, simplify or state the concrete scope difference. A diagnosis offer must not be a compulsory extra purchase for a buyer who already has an approved brief, unless the actual service requires a distinct check and you explain why.
Ready when each candidate has a distinct task, start condition, useful output, and honest no-fit boundary. Separate evidence of comprehensibility from evidence that anyone will buy.
Your decision
What distinct situation would lead someone to each service?
My answer: [ ]
Source and date: [ ]
Still to check: [ ]
Next action, owner, and due date: [ ]
Before you start
- Buyer situations: [Source or notes]
- Delivery capacity: [Source or notes]
- Included outcomes: [Source or notes]
What you will make
A small service menu whose options differ in useful scope.
This is the complete first worksheet from the current edition. The full kit adds the remaining four documents, a worked scenario, and the offline editing workbook, plus an optional Notion import ZIP with Markdown pages and CSV databases.
Worked example
See the worked-case summary
Fictional example included in edition 2.49.1.
Fictional case: North Studio replaces overlapping service descriptions with a design review, a defined implementation project, and a monthly design plan. Eight-hour and 18-hour delivery models fit one candidate month; adding a 20-hour monthly plan would exceed its available capacity. Three complete cards explain scope, requirements, and quoted availability. A viewer initially reads the monthly offer as unlimited emergency support; revised wording and a same-person retest correct that interpretation, while a fourth viewer selects no offer for an out-of-hours operational incident.
Before you choose
What should I have ready for this kit?
Bring buyer situations, delivery capacity, included outcomes. Mark anything you still need to check.
How do I know the work is finished?
A small service menu whose options differ in useful scope. Check your answers against the original records and note anything unresolved before sharing your work.
What is in the Notion import pack?
The download includes an optional NOTION-IMPORT.zip with authored Markdown page templates and sample-filled CSV databases. Import the files in Notion, then set field types and any database relations yourself. Alongside those files, you receive editable Markdown documents and an offline HTML workbook. Set up the imported pages and tables yourself. These are not native Excel, Canva, or Word templates. Extract the whole ZIP before opening the HTML files. Mobile file managers may not run local scripts; the text files and reading edition remain available.
Will this do the work for me?
The kit supplies structure, questions, and examples. You provide the facts, make the decisions, and adapt the finished output. You are responsible for checking the finished work. Custom implementation and professional review are not included.
Included Notion import files · fictional preview data
Service Offer Design Studio
8 Notion page templates, 1 completed worked-case page and 3 sample-filled CSV databases. Extract the product download, then import NOTION-IMPORT.zip in Notion desktop or web.
04-Offer-Canvas.md
# Service offer canvas · [offer ID]
- Buyer situation in their own non-identifying terms: [ ]
- Current evidence and confidence: [ ]
- Who is a good fit, and who is not?: [ ]
- Start condition and required decision maker: [ ]
- Deliverables a buyer can inspect: [ ]
- Inputs and dependencies supplied by the buyer: [ ]
- Explicit exclusions and change route: [ ]
- Review rounds, response window, and support end: [ ]
- Delivery stages and acceptance checks: [ ]
- Owner's effort, cost, capacity, and price review: [ ]
01-Buyer-Situations · sample database
Situation ID
Buyer-described problem
Readiness signal
Evidence source
Question to clarify
Possible next step
Out-of-scope signal
Evidence confidence
Review date
Sample: BS-014
Team has inconsistent onboarding pages
Has an owner and recent examples
Three anonymized enquiry notes
Who can approve copy and access?
Bounded audit before rewrite
No named approver yet
Early pattern; not a market estimate
11/08/2026
Example rows are fictional. The import creates pages and databases; set property types and any relations inside Notion. You configure the tables after import.
